Digital Destiny

We agree that there must be a serious debate and action to address the abysmal lack of media ownership by women and persons of color. But we urge advocates and others to develop a strategy based on the broadband world that is emerging. Soon, many people will receive their [interactive] video and radio programming over PC’s, mobile devices, and digital televisions. If we are to ensure that the new media landscape in the U.S. doesn’t repeat the same market models and homogeneous control we have with broadcasting, cable, and satellite, action is required—now. Powerful media behaviors are being developed that connect young people to the “always-on, always connected” online world. We must make sure that the public interest—especially diversity of ownership—is a fundamental part of this system. For it is the new media landscape—and its awesome power—that will soon help influence our consciousness. The outcome of elections and whether we are fooled into entering another war, for example, will be determined by how the digital media environment is structured. We shouldn’t assume that on its own, the new media will automatically promote a Just and civil society.

That’s why we hope that civil rights groups, media reform organizations and policymakers embrace a multi-faceted approach to bring meaningful change. What’s needed now is serious investment by funders/backers to develop a array of digital media services owned and controlled by women and persons of color. A variety of business models, including community and cooperative ownership, must be explored. These services must be given access for distribution over mobile devices and digital television, in addition to broadband-to-PC service. There should be a myriad of such services—including a new generation of public interest digital media outlets—in every community. Obviously, we require national networks as well.

It’s too late to fundamentally change how commercial broadcast radio, television and even cable are structured—both in terms of ownership and business models. But the “new” world emerging is still somewhat flexible to shape it early on and make a real difference. Certainly, the media industry must be challenged to hire many more diverse executives and journalists—as well as invest in truly representative programming ventures. The FCC and Congress should be a focus for such pressure. But it is only by looking ahead and understanding what the media world is going to look like—as Rupert Murdoch did with MySpace, Google did with YouTube, Viacom is doing with some of its MTV properties, CBS, NBC et al. etc.–that one can hope to make a significant change.

This entry was posted on Friday, April 13th, 2007 at 8:18 am and is filed under media lobbying, wireless, broadband, journalism, media criticism, media ownership, Diversity of ownership, Equitable Access, Public Interest Media, Community Digital Diversity and Civic Engagement Act, Media Mergers, FCC, Web 2.0 & Democracy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.